Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Return Of The Ghostbusters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Return Of The Ghostbusters

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fan Ghostbusters film; does not appear to meet criteria for inclusion. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 10:52, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I put a notability tag on the page months ago, and no one has shown that it has received significant coveraged in reliable sources since. I've done a quick google search and nothing comes up. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:18, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Other than a few non-notable blogs, this hasn't gotten any sort of significant coverage. Heck, there aren't even any professional reviews out there. On a secondary note, someone also added this to the Ghostbusters Franchise page, so if this is deleted we'll have to ensure it's removed from there as well. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Comment: Other than a few fan pages there aren't any sources wikipedia would consider reliable. (If any of the fans or people from the film are reading this, try getting a notable site like AV Club to review it- it would go a long way towards the start of establishing notability.)Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:14, 6 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Additional: Cleanup from this might take a while since it seems that someone has been adding the fandom characters into various pages. Even if the page itself remains, a fan created character doesn't belong on the actual character pages of the canon characters. There's an IP address [1] that added quite a few bits to various pages. Also, if this is considered to be non-notable, we should probably remove the references to this movie (and its short film prequel) from the Ghostbusters (disambiguation) page. I removed the reference to the fan created character but I refrained from removing it from the disambiguation page just in case this does manage to have notability proven. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:44, 6 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

Delete no apparent notability. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:05, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.