Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retroactiv
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 20:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Retroactiv (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable local club night... notability claim appears to come from the coverage in a local weekly free paper. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 09:01, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:NN and lack of WP:RS. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 09:24, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:NOTE, WP:RS and borderline advertising. A Google search reveals more noteworthy things called 'Retroactiv' and we should save this title for those...... Dendodge .. TalkHelp 09:39, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:43, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above Reywas92Talk 20:53, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't delete: if consensus is against this article, make it a redirect to Retroactive. Nyttend (talk) 05:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't delete: I guess notable depends on your point of view. I think it's notable. I've seen less notable articles in Wikipedia, believe me. 98.220.43.195 (talk) 18:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.