Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RetroMUD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:17, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RetroMUD[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) There are no worthwhile redirect targets, as List of MUDs requires each row to have its own article. Ineligible for PROD because it has been PROD'd before. @Mark viking endorsed the PROD, writing, "I tried to find reliable sources in addition to the book source below and failed. There are history docs and reviews online for this MUD, but none were found in reliable sources." czar 08:14, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 08:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not establish notability. Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) 03:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:44, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Chompy Ace 07:18, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.