Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retro-juice productions
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:49, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Retro-juice productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dissolved company,[1] no references given to establish notability, created by an editor of the same name. -- The Anome (talk) 05:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:49, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:49, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete weather it exists today is not relevant to notability, but we cannot have an article sourced only to an organizations's own website. Wikipedia is not a web-hosting service or an online directory.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:00, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: An article sourced only to a contentless Wordpress site. Its previous operational existence can be confirmed from some 3rd party listings ([2], [3]) but I see nothing to indicate the company itself ever achieved notability. AllyD (talk) 06:32, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.