Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retiary organization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete

Retiary organization

Neologism, original research. As far as I can see, this term is only seen in Wikipedia and its mirrors. See also enumerative organization. Delete -- Karada 00:45, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Alr 00:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable and/or original research. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-04 01:55Z
Delete per nom. NeoJustin 02:26, January 4, 2006 (UTC)
Delete per Quarl -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 02:25, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nomination. Evil Eye 02:28, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for reasons given in enumerative organization Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 11:58, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.