Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retainability
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xclamation point 00:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retainability[edit]
- Retainability (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Original research: a novel theory (admitted to by the original editor on the article's talk page) with no independent sources to demonstrate that it is generally notable. Furthermore, there are no sources to verify the source. Even the college's website, offered as a link by the original editor, made no reference to the concept. Wikipedia is not a venue for original publication. —C.Fred (talk) 20:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this is a new theory "developed in September of 2008" and one of Wikipedia's key content policies is that it publishes no original research. JohnCD (talk) 21:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ditto JohnCD. The article says it all. PHARMBOY (TALK) 22:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. By all means, as speedy as possible. No notability, no sources. OR. --Crusio (talk) 22:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 11:18, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.