Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Restore The Broken

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:01, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restore The Broken[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Restore the Broken Non-notable band that does not satisfy any of the musical notability criteria. As a stub, it makes no claim of general notability. There is only one reference, which does not appear to be independent and is not significant coverage.

This article was created in article space, and then (correctly) moved to draft space by User:GermanKity, and has now been moved back to article space by its originator. Moving it to draft space a second time would be move-warring. This might be a candidate for A7 as a band with no credible claim of significance, but that might be challenged, so a deletion discussion is in order, Robert McClenon (talk) 15:58, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:58, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:58, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:58, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:58, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Thank You for taking this into my notice. Still, I can see the article lacks significant coverage that could justify the notability of this band. fails WP:BAND. GermanKity (talk) 16:51, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of notability does not pass WP:NMUSIC; unable to find much, if anything, in the way of SIGCOV. Eagleash (talk) 22:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Does not pass WP:BAND. Alex-h (talk) 07:29, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. TheDreamBoat (talk) 03:33, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Completely non-notable per WP:BAND. Niftysquirrel (talk) 17:37, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.