Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rest In Peace (dofus)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was A7 as about an MMORPG guild that had no assertion of notability. Jclemens (talk) 07:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rest In Peace (dofus)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Generally will qualify under A1.When Google Translate shows the text in English,the result is clearly understood.It fails to identify the subject's topic. That's me! ^{Have doubt?} Track me! 14:38, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete -it's not in English (so, G1), and it has no context (so, A1). Failing that, the article has no sources and does not contain anything encyclopedic; it seems to be a posting about a game. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:43, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, G1 specifically excludes "coherent non-English material", so that won't apply given Dipankan001's comments above. Quasi human | Talk 19:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (not speedy), the context may have been lost in translation, it's pretty clear that it's something to do with a MMORPG called Dofus, based on the translation, I belive it may be a guild for that MMORPG, if that is the case, that is enough context to pass A1 for me. I think that AfD is the way to go unless someone who knows French better than me can clarify. I am !voting delete due to a lack of any coverage in reliable sources about this. Quasi human | Talk 19:48, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.