Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resistance and Liberation (mod)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Marasmusine (talk) 12:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resistance and Liberation (mod)

Fails relevant notability guidelines RenegadeMonster (talk) 08:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Resistance and Liberation (without the "mod" suffix, that is) and redirect to List of Source engine mods. Could be a plausible search term. MuZemike 17:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as lacking reliable third-party sources, failing WP:V, WP:OR, and WP:N. No prejudice against creating a few redirects to the list of mods article. Randomran (talk) 00:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, redirect optional. A search would find it in the list article anyway but a redirect does no harm. It might also be worth somebody familiar with this stuff looking at the other mods listed. I looked at a random sample of them very quickly. Some are looked OK, some a bit borderline and some were referenced only to primary sources and blogs. The latter group should be considered for the same fate as this one. Given that most software is not notable, I wonder how many mods are? Probably more than I would expect but certainly not all of them. --DanielRigal (talk) 00:51, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A lot of Source mods are notable, the problem is that those who create the articles rarely start it off in the right direction. Couple that with the fact online sources like IGN don't do proper mod coverage in the same way that print sources like PC Gamer do, and someone comes along, sees a poorly written article, googles it and sees nothing and so it ends up here. Ironically for games only available online, the sources that indicate that a mod is notable are usually only in print sources. -- Sabre (talk) 11:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources.--Sloane (talk) 04:37, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Source engine mods, there's some coverage of it there. -- Sabre (talk) 11:07, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.