Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Research in Nursing & Health

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Meets WP:SK criterion #1: withdrawn by nominator, no other delete !votes (non-admin closure) CThomas3 (talk) 00:37, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Research in Nursing & Health[edit]

Research in Nursing & Health (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NJOURNALS, with all the sources being taken from the journal except one which does not mention the journal. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:04, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Not a good article, but that is not the point here. Journal is in several selective databases and has an impact factor, which is generally taken as satisfying WP:NJournals. This only needs to be sourced (see WP:JWG for helpful suggestions. --Randykitty (talk) 13:11, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a source for these indexings? The only cited ref is for Journal Citation Reports, which appears to be paywalled. DMacks (talk) 13:22, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Other sources (for the MEDLINE indexing, for example) can easily be found (see JWG) and are not paywalled. The IF is paywalled, but I verified it and it is correct. Scopus can also be verified online without hitting a paywall. I just have no time to do this right now. --Randykitty (talk) 13:27, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep because of being in several selective databases. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 00:07, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I am quite happy to withdraw this nomination. It was not my original intention to nominate the article for deletion, I only did so when I was unable to draftify it because of a technical problem. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:42, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, passes WP:NJOURNALS, but since the nominator withdraws it, this should just be closed as withdrawn Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:22, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 23:03, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 23:03, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 23:03, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.