Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Research Partnership

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Research Partnership

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would've frankly PROded too but as that may be removed, here we are; my own searches have found nothing at all and the listed sources are not convincing of independent substantial notability. SwisterTwister talk 21:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A quick search turns up RS but those sources are not about the subject but rather the terms "research partnership", thus lacking notability. Meatsgains (talk) 22:08, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Admittedly, with such a generic name it is difficult to do reasonable searches. However, I find nothing that shows notability under wP:corp. LaMona (talk) 03:02, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.