Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Research Foundation for Governance in India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:32, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Research Foundation for Governance in India[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is fairly non- neutral and the article is merely promotion of the organisation. The page creator is one of the directors of the organisation Uncletomwood (talk) 06:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:19, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This appears to be self promotion under WP:COS, author does appear to be the lead in the organisation and no other authors have added any credible information to improve the article. Potentially falls foul of WP:notability as none of the major members appears to be notable in their own right Amortias (T)(C) 18:35, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:13, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep I'm open to persausion, but from the sources it seems to get quasi-regular coverage from the major Indian english-language newspapers. Do we have a guideline for thinktanks? --RaiderAspect (talk) 11:44, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.