Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republigay
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Republigay[edit]
- Republigay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Neologism per WP:NEO. John Nagle (talk) 05:06, 29 April 2008 (UTC) --John Nagle (talk) 05:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Prod" was deleted, so we have to do this the hard way. Found on RC patrol. Google shows this term used only in a few blogs. Article close to being an attack article. Dictdef. No useful article content. --John Nagle (talk) 05:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't find any reliable sources, just blogs and fora and such. Oh, and a bunch of sites that want to sell it as a domain name. AnturiaethwrTalk 05:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Just a dictionary definition of a rarely used neologism. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per previous comments Ecoleetage (talk) 19:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete: No references provided, we already have an article on Neoconservatives, but thanks.Dwilso 08:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]- I hope you're not trying to imply that "neoconservative" = "gay Republican". --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable term, no reliable third party sources Jasynnash2 (talk) 11:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As the original PROD'er (I declined a speedy), I could find nothing but blogs as references, so non-notable neologism. Acroterion (talk) 15:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above Ijanderson977 (talk) 17:29, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above.--Berig (talk) 17:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. nneonneo talk 18:06, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-notable neologism. X Marx The Spot (talk) 05:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 20:50, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- DoNotDelete citations and references to this relatively novel term have been added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JD222 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A single blog entry does nothing to indicate notability or currency of this term: blogs are not useful references. Acroterion (talk) 01:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Query: Are article creator Mattburbank (talk · contribs) (only article Republigay) and author of comment above JD222 (talk · contribs) (new account, only edit is to this AfD) the same person? --John Nagle (talk) 02:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.