Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rent Jungle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Rent Jungle[edit]
- Rent Jungle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable company with little coverage in reliable sources. Most sources are located in small Pittsburg publications. I'm open to the idea that this company may one day be notable, but I do not believe that is the case today. Very run of the mill company. Article was created by a COI / PR editor, who's only edited a few articles that he or she has a direct relationship with. CitizenNeutral (talk) 02:14, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:15, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable - I'm not finding evidence of the kind of extensive coverage that is required to demonstrate notability. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 15:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.