Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renera Thompson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Other reliable sources available aplenty. (non-admin closure) Ethically^Yours! 05:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Renera Thompson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 21:45, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 22:50, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as subject is the focus of sufficient reliable third-party coverage ([1], [2], [3], etc.) for the WP:GNG thresholds. (Caution: Google Translate is bad at Samoan.) - Dravecky (talk) 09:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Too bad the Times of India cite is too short to meet the GNG (the Times being the largest-circulation English-language newspaper in the world), but the other two cites are good. Nha Trang ^Allons! 20:24, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 20:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.