Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renee Richards(UK)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Spartaz Humbug! 21:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Renee Richards(UK)[edit]
- Renee Richards(UK) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
fails WP:PORNBIO ninety:one 16:09, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article has no quality, or importance. DeadmanUndertaker 18:49, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Surely famous enough in her field of work?--No More Tears, Baby (talk) 18:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with nom. Fails WP:PORNBIO - no major awards, unique contributions, or notable mainstream media feature appearances that I could find. Tim Ross (talk) 20:48, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agreed, notability is lacking. (Though that photo is, admittedly, quite nice). Ecoleetage (talk) 21:42, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep She's been nominated for a major award in the field - an AVN award [1] Jamesmchallem 13:03, 3 June 2008 (GMT)
- CommentThe movie[1] she was in was nominated, not Renee. Vinh1313 (talk) 14:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep She's also one of the main (top 3) girls regularly featured at TelevisionX (UK's flagship version of Playboy TV) [2] Jamesmchallem 12:59, 4 June 2008 (GMT)
- You already voted, but can you find a WP:reliable source independent of Television X that says all this? • Gene93k (talk) 12:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice. The subject does not quite meet WP:PORN BIO at this time, but perhaps later. RFerreira (talk) 16:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.