Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RenderDoc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Crytek. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 16:42, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RenderDoc[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article posses no sources that indicate importance. All six sources mention the tool by name, but only in a trivial manner (along the lines of "we used renderDoc to do [subject of article]". I cannot find any mention of the tool on google either, apart from various forms of documentation. As such, this article fails the general notability guidelines. Xevus11 (talk) 15:54, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 15:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 15:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 15:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 15:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 15:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The VGSE results are fairly reasonable. I wouldn't be opposed to a merge with Crytek or similar. (There might be a better merge target.) --Izno (talk) 17:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Crytek. There is no in-depth coverage from reliable sources, but enough passing mentions that a mention in the company's article would be helpful. This article is short enough to be merged without unbalancing the Crytek article. — Newslinger talk 11:09, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.