Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/René Berthiaume (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:29, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

René Berthiaume

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Smalltown mayor (pop 10K) who doesn't get past WP:NPOL on that basis, and isn't well-sourced enough to get past WP:GNG either. The history here is that the original deletion discussion took place at a time when the only substantive claim of notability was his unsuccessful candidacy in a federal election, so it was deleted on that basis and then later recreated when he was elected to the mayoralty — so it doesn't qualify for speedy as a recreation of deleted content, but the claim of notability and the volume of sourcing here still aren't actually sufficient to qualify him for inclusion in Wikipedia. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 01:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 01:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 01:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Maybe WP:G7--180.172.239.231 (talk) 11:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, it wouldn't qualify for G7. I'm not the original author (only the current revision is in any way "my" work) and it's been edited extensively by other people (a condition of G7 is that the original author is also the only substantive author, which I'm not.) Bearcat (talk) 17:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:05, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete falls far short of notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:31, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.