Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rejina Uprety

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 05:35, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rejina Uprety[edit]

Rejina Uprety (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence here of any significant notabiliyy. Only one ref appears to be independent and that hardly evidences notabiliy. Fails WP:GNG.  Velella  Velella Talk   08:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  10:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  10:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  10:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as this is yet another classic case of a non-notable and not well-known actress for which my searches only found some trivial mentions at News and browsers, even then it was mostly for her marriage and other relationship matters. Notifying tagger Vansockslayer in case they want to comment. SwisterTwister talk 05:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete my sweeps of Nepali news did not turn up much.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:39, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait working on article to improve--Biplab Anand (Talk with me) 16:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting given Biplab Anand's intent to improve the article. clpo13(talk) 22:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13(talk) 22:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - but the additions have not added anything to the requirements for notability.  Velella  Velella Talk   10:31, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.