Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reinado Internacional del Café

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Hopefully somebody will add the sources found by Kraxler to the article... Randykitty (talk) 15:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reinado Internacional del Café

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no independent sourcing conform WP:RS The Banner talk 13:28, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nom, fails GNG.TheLongTone (talk) 14:48, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:38, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:59, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:59, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The coverage in El Tiempo alone, the newspaper of reference in Colombia, is quite significant... passes WP:GNG. Vrac (talk) 19:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I've started a conversation about the 2015 beauty pageant AFD marathon here. Vrac (talk) 02:41, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable pageant, Fails NEVENT & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 03:00, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this is a notable pageant, held since 1957, with extensive coverage in independent reliable sources, passes easily WP:EVENTCRIT and WP:GNG. The absence of sources in the article is irrelevant when it is possible to find them at web searches. The nominator failed to observe WP:BEFORE B2 and C1. Kraxler (talk) 18:16, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm not seeing the sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Many of them are here. Kraxler (talk) 03:43, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.