Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reina Leone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reina Leone[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails pornbio and minor gng type coverage falls firmly under oneevent. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:39, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom - Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 01:52, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails GNG. Was the subject of coverage in the Chronicle over a scandal, which is more mainstream press coverage than your average porn bio subject generates, but still insufficient to get beyond BLP-1E. Carrite (talk) 15:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the accurate analyses by nom and by Carrite. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 12:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.