Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reid Fragel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be userfied upon request. ‑Scottywong | converse _ 05:09, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reid Fragel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NGRIDIRON hasn't played in the NFL. Fails WP:GNG as he hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Hack (talk) 07:17, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clear fail on WP:NGRIDIRON having not played professionally. Checking sources, I find none that seem to pass WP:GNG. Without playing professionally, we need to judge notability on his college career. Typically, offensive collegiate linemen do not generate enough press to pass and I believe this is the case here.--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:38, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:09, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question Since the guy's on the practise squad, could this be incubated instead of being deleted? Of course I agree that he doesn't currently warrant an article, but that's not the only thing to consider. Unless I misunderstand something, this guy would have a better-than-average chance of playing in the NFL; it would seem wasteful to delete the article entirely if we could simply wait for the possibility of him gaining WP:ATHLETE notability. Nyttend (talk) 15:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I have no problem with userfy if anyone wants to take custody of the article.--Paul McDonald (talk) 05:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails to meet WP:NGRIDIRON or WP:NCOLLATH. Userfy is OK with me, too.204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.