Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Registered Accessibility Specialist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 22:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Registered Accessibility Specialist

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. A stub since it was created in 2005, probably a permastub. It was apparently an orphan from its creation until 2018, and the only incoming links now are from a "see also" section and the disambiguation page Ras.

No plausible redirect target. Un assiolo (talk) 15:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Texas. Un assiolo (talk) 15:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All I find are articles that use the title when describing a person. Nothing for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:43, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it's basically just a dicdef, there's simply not much to say about the subject beyond "it exists". Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:39, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Essentially a run-of-the-mill dictionary definition of a job title. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.