Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regional Transmission Organization
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 02:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Regional Transmission Organization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
article has been replaced by an updated and properly referenced article ISO_RTO -- Smbateman (talk) 19:38, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Discussion on the AfD of Independent System Operator is relevant to this AfD: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Independent_System_Operator Fjbfour (talk) 01:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It seems to me that ISO and RTO are distinct but related entities. As such, there is no valid reason to delete this article. -- Whpq (talk) 17:46, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and discuss how our content about electricity distribution in the US should be organised on article talk pages or at the relevant project pages. Even if this isn't kept as a separate page it should certainly be at least a redirect, and ISO RTO is a very uninformative article title, so that is not the best name for any merged article. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Phil Bridger. If someone wants to delete two articles that have some history with a new article that does not appear to be formatted like most articles, I wonder what the advantage of switching is? The better approach might be to fold the new material and references into the old articles. I don't see any reason to switch to an alphabet soup article name. We improve by adding to and updating existing articles and not deleting what is here and replacing with something new. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.