Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reginald Klimionok

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:32, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reginald Klimionok[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject that fails WP:BASIC. Various source searches are only providing fleeting, minor passing mentions in rs. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:21, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Current article is totally reliant on PRIMARY. I could not see any IRS to support any of the article. However, he is the author of several books, which are held by multiple main stream libraries, but without any IRS to support even the most basic core/depth I do not see how the subject can be got over the GNG or AUTHOR line. If someone can find some even partially core/depth IRS material I could be convinced otherwise. Aoziwe (talk) 12:47, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 14:42, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yes, he's authored several books that are held in main stream libraries, but I can't find a single independent source that covers him significantly. The complete lack of such sources means that almost no content can be added in this page that comes from someone independent, so any content must be referenced by his personal website.--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 19:22, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.