Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regents (punk rock band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:58, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regents (punk rock band)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG Graywalls (talk) 09:56, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 09:56, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 09:56, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 09:56, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 09:56, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 09:56, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:BAND and WP:GNG. Lack of coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the music group. The recordings have not charted on national music charts or received certifications or accolades. --Ashleyyoursmile! 13:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Ashleyyoursmile I have added a bunch of new sources. Please check again. Lesliechin1 (talk) 22:23, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep I found a lot of news on them and have add 10 new sources. There is coverage on them on grammy.com.Lesliechin1 (talk) 22:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Lesliechin1, well and good but not sure about how significant that is. Let's look at the sources: 1 has a small piece of introduction, but it is an interview with the members so is not independent of the subject. 2 is again not significant coverage, a small piece about who the members are and where they were formed. 3 and 4 are reviews of their album, not of them. 6 is an interview with the founder of their label, Lovitt. So it's not independent (it is basically someone with close affiliation with the subject talking about the subject. 7 is again neither reliable nor independent. 8 and 9 look decent I think. 10 qualifies as a passing mention. Ashley yoursmile! 09:30, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews of their albums of course count towards the notability of the band, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:24, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.