Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regan MacNeil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Need some editorial work but in principle the consensus is not to delete. Tone 19:50, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regan MacNeil[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a duplication of the plot sections of both The Exorcist (film) and The Exorcist. The contents do not introduce any new sources or information not already contained in the articles for the film/novel. Sottolacqua (talk) 17:46, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because it follows the same reasons as the nomination for Regan MacNeil:

Sottolacqua (talk) 18:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep genuinely iconic character, although I suspect some expansion and merging would do it good (the Pazuzu (The Exorcist) and Captain Howdy articles could probably both be merged to Regan's) Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:15, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Iconic characters from an extremely influential film. Many sources discuss the film and its characters in detail. DLAwaster (talk) 00:04, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. To avoid duplication with main article, move all relevant info about character from main article to character article. This should also make main article shorter and more manageable.--Blitzer Van Susterwolf (talk) 19:15, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.