Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refund Home Loans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Refund Home Loans

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Refund Home Loans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that it meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. There is the possibility of merge/redirect to founder, but I think that might unbalance the article. Boleyn (talk) 18:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Weak Keep - From what I can tell this just barely meets SIRS with the Advisor article being the most in-depth and substantive. It seems to have been notable and controversial independently of the notable founder. WilsonP NYC (talk) 20:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

• Comment there is some coverage. I found this in-depth article. Geeraarts (talk) 00:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

• Delete - No claim to notability. Llajwa (talk) 03:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

• Delete I agree. Fails GNG. MaskedSinger (talk) 07:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
• Delete Fails GNG. Coverage is run of the mill. Not the only Australian company to breach the Trade Practices Act. LibStar (talk) 22:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.