Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reformation Bible Puritan Baptist Church

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reformation Bible Puritan Baptist Church[edit]

Reformation Bible Puritan Baptist Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a WP:FRINGE group, and doesn't appear to be a notable one. The only independent coverage I find is [1]. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • DeleteNot any more notable than any other church. Just because it is a hate group doesn't make it any more notable Neither, does the fact that the pastor has an internet radio show (anybody can do that). Fails WP:GNG making this a strong delete.--Rusf10 (talk) 01:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 03:33, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 03:33, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- This is an obnoxious group in my view. It sounds like a small one, possibly a one-man band. The only reason to keep it would be that it was so notorious as to be notable on that ground. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:26, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 05:47, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Coverage in WP:RS appears to be limited to a small number of articles mentioning this church (apparently a single location denomination) as among the groups listed by the Southern Poverty Law Center, and a feature article in the local newspaper Lebanon Daily News (pop. of Lebanon, Pa., : 23,000) Newmanstown man plans for racially separated Lebanon County. While the Lebanon Daily News is a WP:RS, this church, recently established run by an avowed racist, fails WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete I'm not convinced that simply getting listed by the SPLC is enough notoriety, and while appears that Phelps's book has a better claim to that, notoriety, er, notability is not inherited. One gets the sense that it isn't so much a hate group as it is one hate person who wrote one hateful book. Mangoe (talk) 16:59, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Semi-strong keep. The SPLC is a major organization related to the subject, I'd say a designation from them confers notability. That should be worked into the article per WP:IMPROVE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etzedek24 (talkcontribs) 02:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment There is an article on the Rational Wiki on the elder bishop Eric Jon Phelps. He has been on a couple of talk shows as well. Most of these churches are single church independent groups, much like the Westboro Baptists who have only a single Church without affiliation to a larger church group. However, Phelps does have quite a bit of influence over some of the independent fundamentalist through his writings - Vatican Assassins which is now a four volume book (fourth edition). Individuals who peddle conspiracies quote from the books as if it is fact. DeusImperator (talk) 05:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete insufficient coverage. Being listed by the SPLC does not automatically make an organization notable. feminist (talk) 14:39, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.