Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReefDoctor
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted as a foundational copyvio. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:57, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ReefDoctor[edit]
- ReefDoctor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references or citations for notability have been supplied since article was created. The entire article seems to be written in the first person by the ReefDoctor himself. For example, "The focus of ReefDoctor’s Marine management programme has been our Fisheries survey and Artificial habitat programme." Article does not appear to meet requirements for notability. him Warfieldian (talk) 17:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.