The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination was disruption by blocked sockpuppet. EJF (talk) 12:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
unreferenced, dubious notability CholgatalK! 09:41, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
KeepJWB (talk) 14:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable. Wikidemo (talk) 19:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)...and speedy close. Nomination is by a confirmed sockpuppet, whose recent deletion spree was part of the abusive behavior that got him indefinitely blocked.[1]Wikidemo (talk) 18:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
