Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redwall (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 14:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redwall (film)[edit]

Explicitly fails future film notability guidelines. No prejudice towards recreation when reliable sources indicate that filming has already begun. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 05:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, virtually no information appears to be currently available; even the official website is just a placeholder. The sole content of the article appears to be assumptions about the movie's plot based on the book. At best this movie rates a brief mention at Redwall until enough sourced information is available to write an encyclopedic article. ~ mazca ^t|c 12:54, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 14:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. An empty website is admission of an utter lack of notability. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Even if there's little information, the movie is real, and therefore notable. Filming doesn't have to begin before we create an article on the subject. Even movies that have been canceled can have their own article as long as it's notable. ScienceApe (talk) 18:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Being "real" is not the same as being "notable", and per WP:NFF filming is required to have commenced before we create an article. PC78 (talk) 19:49, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above. Far too soon for an article on this film. Official website is merely a blank placeholder, and even the article states that "no further information is avalible at the time". PC78 (talk) 19:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and WP:USERFY... with respects to User:ScienceApe. Real or not, the article needs coverage. When it meets the guidelines for future film notability please bring it back. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of coverage; if there are any details that surface about this planned film, they can be placed at a "Film adaptation" section at Redwall until production is verified to have begun. —Erik (talk • contrib) 15:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:CRYSTAL. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.