Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redveil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominated by a confirmed blocked sockpuppet with no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 22:59, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redveil[edit]

Redveil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to locate WP:THREE in the article. Fails GNG DavidEfraim (talk) 06:06, 30 August 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. plicit 05:22, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Doomsdayer's list of sources, easily clears WP:SINGER. QuietHere (talk) 03:44, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, it's close, as a lot of the sources are of substandard quality, but I believe the combination of the BV and Pitchfork sources along with the Wonderland Magazine review are enough to showcase a GNG pass. Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:42, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.