Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redundant topologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 05:14, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant topologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references in nearly seven years. Editorial with unencyclopedic tone. Material partially covered in Network topology and Mesh network. I don't see much value for readers. Ringbang (talk) 03:48, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:14, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unsourced and vague. Hopeless. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:43, 3 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. First I thought it might be a WP:COATRACK for something called VLAN Transport Protocol, since that is given as the "fix" for the "solution" (although as usual, nothing at all to do with solutions!). But it appears that the original article properly wikilinked to spanning tree protocol, which is where this article could be merged if it had any useful sourced content. But this edit by an unregistered user in July 2013 broke that link anyway. W Nowicki (talk) 23:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.