Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redline (drink)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 02:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redline (drink) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Created simply to remove the content from redline, this product is not actually notable. Note that it appears to be maintained by interested parties (check history and talk page). ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 04:36, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agreed; non-notable drink in a crowded market with little discerning features. The provided material is unreferenced, and ref tags have been removed by the interested-party editors. -- Mikeblas (talk) 17:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nothing turns up in news, book or scholar searches using Google. Standard search turns up mirrors of the article, blogs, opinions and promotional sites. No verifiable sources appear available. Geoff Who, me? 23:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Article does not meet general notability criteria--יום יפה (talk) 14:44, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.