Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redhill and District Saturday Football League
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Redhill and District Saturday Football League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable regional Saturday league playing at a level below WP:FOOTYN's presumption of notability. I'm not really seeing enough for WP:GNG either. Internet searches come back with nothing better than an utterly trivial mention in The Guardian. A reasonable number of results in newspapers, for example searches of Redhill and District Saturday League and Redhill and District Football League come up with very brief write-ups for the AGMs and fixture/result listings in local papers like Surrey Mirror, Sussex Agricultural Express and Dorking and Leatherhead Advertiser, in most cases taking up only a small portion of a column on one page. Not enough for WP:GNG in my view.
Similar case to Guildford and Woking Alliance League. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:14, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 21:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination, Spiderone seems to have done the research here and I trust his judgement that this fails GNG. Govvy (talk) 10:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable football league, as per nom. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:07, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 13:52, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom, non-notable football league CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC) ]
- Delete - I fully agree with the nominator's case and the above comments. This is clearly not a notable league. Dunarc (talk) 20:59, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Devokewater 13:48, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.