Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red arrow camp
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. JYolkowski // talk 22:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe that having some famous people go to it as children makes this camp notable. The google results that I found were large relating to price lists and potential jobs. ViridaeTalk 22:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I think this is a legitimate claim to notoriety, certainly much more immediate than many entries which delve into the obscure, yet maintain an intellectual nature and are therefore unquestioned. Furthermore, the longevity of the camp is notable. I'm really not sure why you want to eliminate this entry... I'd say it's far more notable that Loituma Girl, but I see no reason to eliminate that post either. In my opinion, and this may not be the stated policy of Wikipedia, something is not notable if its greatest claim to fame is a Wikipedia article; if the average reader can only relate to the subject by reading about its existance. In this case, "some famous people" make the subject notable on a higher level. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.222.31.177 (talk • contribs)
Keep
http://www.chrisfarleyfoundation.com/chris/index.php?category_id=1654
http://www.lakelandtimes.com/features.php?story=104
http://www.racalumni.org/index.php
http://www.athleticnetwork.net/site74.php
horribly long link - shortened to stop it stretching the page.
The preceding were found by use of google. Of note is the ebay link for sale of a book written about the history of the camp. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.222.31.177 (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.