Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Vines (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6. — ξ ^xplicit 00:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Red Vines (disambiguation)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary disambiguation between the main topic and one other article. Accomplished with {{for}} in the main article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:57, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete:There is no point of a disambiguation page.--Written by GeneralCheese 22:26, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per {{db-disambig}} and CSD-G6. -- JHunterJ (talk) 03:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Agree with Gene93k - The article Red Vines already has a header stating where to go if you intended on finding the article on the song. Curiously, I believe that this article would be warranted IF there were more 'Red Vines' articles, which there are not. 2 different articles is to small, this can be avoided with my first statement. -petiatil ^{»user»speak} 04:17, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete meets criteria for Template:db-disambig. Boleyn2 (talk) 21:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.