Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Scare (podcast)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 22:03, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Red Scare (podcast)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable - not every tiny podcast needs a Wiki page. Yellow-billed Loon (talk) 06:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Yellow-billed Loon (talk) 06:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Has received coverage from The Telegraph, The Times, and The New York Times. Greyjoy^talk 06:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - it has been covered by notable publications and has thousands of listeners, according to its Patreon page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Socksinrain (talk • contribs) 09:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - it is able to attract notable guests such as Steve Bannon, Glenn Greenwald and Tulsi Gabbard. A small non-notable podcast would not attract a US presidential candidate as a guest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:D612:3E00:1533:707C:3195:34 (talk) 13:00, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - By the first two references pointed out by Greyjoy. The NYT reference is a passing mention, but the previous two are more than sufficient. Jlevi (talk) 17:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - page needs to be reworked and fleshed out more but the podcast is obviously notable, with significant coverage in reliable sources. This nomination was unquestionably made for the purposes of vandalism or disruption, OP seems to have a personal gripe with one of the hosts and therefore their concerns about "notability" cannot be taken seriously. If you check their history, they've nominated Dasha Nekrasova's page for deletion twice in less than two months (both times the page survived by significant margins), and they are now trying to get the podcast's page deleted. Pinchofhope (talk) 21:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.