Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Salute (film)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 02:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Red Salute (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources. Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I'm finding some sources. It looks like IndiaGlitz fell all over themselves to report about it and I did finally find an article by The Hindu about it. I'm still searching, but it's somewhat hard going since there is the more famous Stanwyck film that pops up with some false positives.Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Keep Released film that received coverage. Meets WP:NF. We do not expect that a seven-year-old Malayalam would remain in the headlines or have the same sort of coverage as major American studio releases of any era. Kudos to Tokyogir79 for the efforts. THAT's how we build an encyclopedia. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As per significant coverage. NickCochrane (talk) 17:00, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.