Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Rover (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Insufficient references presented about the film itself, and notability not inherited. Stifle (talk) 11:08, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red Rover (film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced article about a film with no discernible claim to passing WP:NFILM. As always, a film needs to have some reliably sourced evidence of significance, such as notable film awards and/or reviews from established and reputable film critics, to qualify for a Wikipedia article, and just having an entry on IMDb or Rotten Tomatoes is not automatically enough in and of itself -- but existence is the only notability claim on display here, IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes are the only "sources", and I can't find any other sourcing on either Google or ProQuest to salvage it with. (Note that this is not the Shane Belcourt film from 2018, it's a thing from 2003 directed by Marc S. Grenier, so don't get led astray by the sources that do exist for the Belcourt film.) Bearcat (talk) 23:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 23:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 23:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Found a review at CineMagazine [[1]]. Not enough on its own, but its a start. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:57, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per review indicated by Donaldd23 and the three external links indicated in the article. Film stars three well-known actors who have extensive Wikipedia coverage. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A reminder that notability is not inherited. We need more than well known actors starring. Paragon Deku (talk) 05:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn’t appear to be a particularly notable film in its own right and sourcing seems too scant to prove notability. Paragon Deku (talk) 05:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ambrosiawater (talk) 08:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.