Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Rock Peak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Mirabito Range. Daniel (talk) 17:46, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Red Rock Peak[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not really sure if this is notable, I can't really find any reliable sources about it other than the public domain material it was taken from. Most results on Google are for other mountains also named similarly. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 16:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Antarctica-related deletion discussions. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 16:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mirabito Range per WP:GEONATURAL - that article should be developed instead. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 16:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Good point, I should have done my due diligence to find a suitable target before nominating. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 17:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Have a word with Aymatth2 who is quietly busy in Antarctica with the names dumps articles, too. Uncle G (talk) 22:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. I much prefer redirecting to a section in a parent article. It takes a lot less effort than an AfD discussion, and users can at least find the basic data even if there is nothing else. See David Range#Features. A lot of the sections here, at present with {{main}} links to stubs, will end up as the targets from stubs converted to redirects. Aymatth2 (talk) 23:33, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I pumped up Mirabito Range mechanically by adding a section for each entry in Geographic Names of the Antarctic that mentions the range. Probably the other three peaks could also be quietly redirected to the range article, assuming searches do not turn up significant new information about them. The range article could obviously use much more detail about geology, glaciology, botany etc. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above.Tumbuka Arch (talk) 12:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.