Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Jack's treasure
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Red Jack's treasure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources seem to mention the topic. Challenged for sources, the author began creating fake sources. See [[1]]. SummerPhD (talk) 01:00, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no sources to establish notability on google news archives. --Nuujinn (talk) 00:09, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as hoax. Edward321 (talk) 04:45, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete apparent hoax. The sources given reek of fakeness: for example, the ISBN given isn't just invalid, it isn't even the right number of digits! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:50, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.