Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Fun Cells Records
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:58, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Red Fun Cells Records[edit]
- Red Fun Cells Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:CORP per lack of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Google Search. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 23:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This article has no references and and the two external links are to their home site and a Facebook page. None of the artists signed are notable and the article appears biased.Housewatcher (talk) 06:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable same with the signed artists. Joe Chill (talk) 21:20, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.