Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Dust (V series)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to V (science fiction). ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:22, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Red Dust (V series)[edit]
- Red Dust (V series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This element of fiction does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 22:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to' V (science fiction), as it is a prominent plot element to the TV series, and the climax for the miniseries. 70.55.203.112 (talk) 05:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Mergeas specified just above. It would greatly help the main article, which is not clear without it, and be exactly the proportional discussion of plot called for in WP:NOT It is time we revisited these articles in a systematic way, to get he material were it is most appropriate. A redirect would be appropriate, for it's a memorable term. DGG (talk) 08:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as both the above. Redirect red dust as a search term if appropriate. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per DGG. Recurring fictional elements in major series are worthy to be mentioned somewhere on wikipedia, just not as separate articles (unless they establish their notability). – sgeureka t•c 19:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect per DGG. I agree 100% ~ Ningauble (talk) 18:37, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.