Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Deer Magpies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Australian rules football in Canada. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:12, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Red Deer Magpies[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a non-notable Australian Rules Football team in Canada (that very combination would suggest non-notability). There are very few google hits, and none that would remotely suggest this team meets the (very generous) notability standards for sporting teams. Mkativerata (talk) 06:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not entirely familiar with notability for sporting teams - is it the same as WP:ATHLETE? I can't find it, though I'm sure I've seen it somewhere.. anyway, despite my Wiki absent-mindedness, I was able to locate this, this and this via Google News. No idea if this helps or hinders a case for deletion; I'd have to review it in relation to the specific guidelines (if I can find them...*goes notability hunting*). SMC (talk) 11:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ as while useful, the above news articles aren't helpful in showing notability. For the most part, they're just a report on various admin matters. SMC (talk) 11:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, changed from delete, as while my argument above still stands, The-Pope's suggestion fits even better - it's a perfectly reasonable search term. SMC (talk) 12:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Australian rules football in Canada.The-Pope (talk) 11:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. The-Pope (talk) 11:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. The-Pope (talk) 11:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.