Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Army crimes in Georgia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, an obvious POV fork by a user currently blocked due to his inability to rein in his strong opinions. The path from here to an article compliant with fundamental policies is not clear, and it is close to impossible to sort any valid material from the mess of uncited opinion. Presence of this content degrades the encyclopaedia. Guy (Help!) 17:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red Army crimes in Georgia[edit]

Arbitrary POV essay, continuation of user's POV pushing; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red army crimes in Lithuania. `'Miikka 03:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not essay but sequence of historical facts!Ttturbo 07:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that such article is NPOW kind if there is no category like Millitary history of Soviet Union below the text. This, history consists of victories against nazzi, heroes, terrible loosings, economical changes etc. But if we stay this theme alone without crime analysis commited, then we occure in NPOW position supporting red side. I suppose, my position becouse of context category to be balanced enough to stay in the limits of neutral POWTtturbo 08:47, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clearly POV. eaolson 03:44, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article is trying to push a point of view. It is not encyclopedic because of this.--†Sir James Paul† 04:00, 29 June 2007 (UTC) This article is trying to realise Jesus' don't KILL!Ttturbo 07:24, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Red Army atrocities (WWII)?Some thing 05:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red Army crimes were comitted not only during WWII unfortunately.Ttturbo 07:21, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Everything in this article is already well covered in History of Georgia (country) and Georgia (country), making this a content fork to promote a position. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and salt the earth. See Sjakkale. No reason to merge this one. Can we also agree that threaded comment here is immediately moved to the talk page? Judging by the page quoted by Miikka, this page is going to be attacked soon. --Pan Gerwazy 07:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete POV forking of the worst kind. No way is this ever going to be NPOV. Judging from the nominators comments someone should have a serious word or two with the creator about the meaning of disruption and POV pushing in general. MartinDK 08:01, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - Disagree with the nominator. Kingjeff 15:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm pretty much sure that it is already covered in Red Army article or other related article outside of this useless POV-filled article.--JForget 00:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but add more information and sources and modify the text. Wikipedia is some process of creation, but not the court! Please, discuss this article first and only after this make abstract vote debates. Supporting of any war crime or military crime hiders is colaboration with criminal murders - so it is the crime too, like situation about holocost denying!!!Ttturbo 07:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Chaotic colection of few events lacking context, attack page. Pavel Vozenilek 21:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this article is hopelessly POV and not up to WP standards... -- Grafikm ^(AutoGRAF) 01:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article is poorly sourced and has POV issues. I wouldn't mind seeing a legitimate article on this topic, though, so no prejudice to recreation in another form. —Psychonaut 11:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.