Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red (psychedelic trance)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:19, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Red (psychedelic trance)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No proof of notability per WP:MUSICBIO, article has sources like twitter,myspace etc. I supose it was created by artist himself. PtQa (talk) 21:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Meph^talk 21:53, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments - Be careful about suggesting that an editor has done things such as creating an article about himself if you don't have any evidence. Or if you do have evidence, always state what that evidence is.

My main concern with the article is that its entire content was obviously created using an exceptionally poor online translation engine, and as a result, most of the text qualifies as WP: Patent Nonsense. The ideal would be to replace the current text with freshly researched and referenced info, but unfortunately, I can't find the article's subject in All Music Guide, and for obvious reasons an internet search for information on a musician known simply as "Red" would be insanely difficult. Even a search of the Russian Music Charts produces way too many results to sift through.--Martin IIIa (talk) 21:29, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.