Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red-Tiger Bulldog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thie article was clearly baking up the wrong tree. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:23, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Red-Tiger Bulldog

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unreferenced page about what seems to be a designer "breed". The breed's Facebook page appears to be a major source of information, whilst the breed's official body appears to be another Facebook page. Cavalryman V31 (talk) 02:35, 19 July 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Delete. Not recognized by any major kennel club or other breed registry. This is more "backyard breeder" promotional junk, the dog-breed equivalent of a garage band. And as with garage bands, most attempts to establish a breed fail long before reaching notability. This one has years to go and low chances. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 03:48, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Regards, KCVelaga (talk • mail) 07:28, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete TOOSOON, fails GNG. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:49, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there's no sourcing, and a simple Google search identifies the #1 result as being information provided from the breeder. Fails WP:GNG. If there was a single source I'd recommend a merge and redirect to Bulldog, preserving the history, but I can't find one. Also, FWIW, this started as what looks like a cut and paste copyvio. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:36, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - my attempts to find multiple reliable sources covering topic were not successful. Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG.--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 02:01, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Could not sniff out anything of substance. -The Gnome (talk) 13:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.