Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recovery of Ukraine Conference in Lugano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ironic that the deletion rationale is that the article was created by a sockpuppet when the AFD was created by a different sockpuppet. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:48, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Recovery of Ukraine Conference in Lugano

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Recovery of Ukraine Conference in Lugano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by a blocked user according to @MER-C: Молдовський винний погріб (talk) 08:14, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Ukraine. Shellwood (talk) 09:39, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
• Comment perhaps the page appeared too soon. The author is indeed blocked. The neutral POV is needed here as I'm from Ukraine and the topic seems to be notable. --IgorTurzh (talk) 21:12, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

WP:STARTOVER but the writing style itself is not typical POV pushing as in other cases. A09090091 (talk) 18:11, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

• Keep I would like to withdraw the nomination. Creation by a blocked user is not a reason for deletion. I read the guidelines for AfD not carefully. My mistake. --Молдовський винний погріб (talk) 12:38, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:51, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

• Keep. The topic seems notable; the POV seems reasonable. Radzy0 (talk) 00:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.